Giovanni Russo The initiative by U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren to address the use of cryptocurrencies in illegal financial activities has seen a growing wave of support within the Senate. Senator Warren expressed concern over cryptocurrencies being utilized for nefarious purposes. “There is a pressing need for new legislation to tackle the use of cryptocurrencies in aiding terrorist organizations, rogue nations, drug traffickers, ransomware operators, and scammers in laundering immense amounts of illicitly obtained funds, circumventing sanctions, funding unlawful weapon programs, and profiting from harmful cyberattacks,” she stated.
Table Of Contents
Elizabeth Warren’s Cryptocurrency Bill Gains Traction
Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) recently announced an increase in bipartisan support for her Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act, with Senators Raphael Warnock (D-GA), Laphonza Butler (D-CA), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), and Ben Ray Luján (D-NM) joining as co-sponsors. The act aims to diminish the risks of illicit finance through cryptocurrencies by sealing existing gaps and aligning the digital asset sector more closely with existing anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing regulations.
Senator Warren first introduced this bill in December of the previous year. In July, it was reintroduced with the support of Senators Roger Marshall (R-KS), Joe Manchin (D-WV), and Lindsey Graham (R-SC). Despite its intent, the bill has faced criticism from cryptocurrency advocates, who view it as a significant infringement on the personal freedom and privacy of crypto users.
Other senators endorsing the bill include Gary Peters (D-MI), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Tina Smith (D-MN), Angus King (I-ME), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Bob Casey (D-PA), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Michael Bennet (D-CO), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), and John Fetterman (D-PA).
Senator Warren emphasized the necessity of new legislation, highlighting the Treasury Department’s concerns about cryptocurrencies facilitating a range of illicit activities.
Senator Van Hollen added, “The absence of basic legal protections in the crypto space exposes Americans to numerous risks. Moreover, cryptocurrencies have become the favored payment method for terrorist groups, drug cartels, and authoritarian regimes to finance their illegal operations.”
The bill has garnered endorsements from various organizations, including the Bank Policy Institute, Massachusetts Bankers Association, and Transparency International U.S.
Key Provisions of the Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act
The legislation proposes extending Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) obligations, like know-your-customer requirements, to various participants in the digital asset field, including wallet providers, miners, and validators. It also aims to bridge significant gaps related to ‘unhosted’ digital wallets by mandating FinCEN to finalize and enforce its December 2020 proposed rule. This rule necessitates banks and money service businesses to verify customer and counterparty identities, maintain records, and report certain digital asset transactions involving unhosted wallets or wallets in jurisdictions non-compliant with BSA.
Furthermore, the bill seeks to bolster BSA compliance enforcement and extend BSA rules on reporting foreign bank accounts to encompass digital assets. This would require U.S. persons involved in transactions over $10,000 through offshore digital asset accounts to report to the Internal Revenue Service.
In October, Warren and over 100 legislators urged the Biden administration to address the issue of crypto-financed terrorism. However, blockchain analytics firm Elliptic countered claims that Hamas had raised significant funds through cryptocurrencies. While concerns about the illicit use of crypto are valid, less than 1% of annual crypto transactions are illicit, in contrast to the 2% to 5% of the global GDP ($800 billion to $2 trillion) estimated to be involved in illegal activities and money laundering through traditional banking systems and cash.
This development raises questions about the balance between regulation and the freedom of crypto users.
Please share your thoughts on Senator Elizabeth Warren’s cryptocurrency bill and its implications in the comments section below.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Cryptocurrency Regulation
What is Senator Elizabeth Warren’s bill concerning cryptocurrency about?
Senator Elizabeth Warren’s bill, known as the Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act, aims to curb the use of cryptocurrencies in illegal financial activities. It proposes to extend the Bank Secrecy Act requirements to digital asset entities, thereby aligning the cryptocurrency sector with existing anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing regulations.
Which senators have shown support for Senator Warren’s cryptocurrency bill?
Senators Raphael Warnock, Laphonza Butler, Chris Van Hollen, John Hickenlooper, and Ben Ray Luján have joined as co-sponsors of Senator Warren’s bill. Other supporters include Senators Roger Marshall, Joe Manchin, and Lindsey Graham, along with several others.
What are the main provisions of the Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act?
The Act focuses on extending know-your-customer requirements to digital asset wallet providers, miners, and validators. It also aims to regulate ‘unhosted’ digital wallets, strengthen enforcement of compliance, and include digital assets in reporting foreign bank accounts to the IRS.
Has the Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act faced any criticism?
Yes, the bill has faced criticism from cryptocurrency advocates, who argue that it represents an infringement on the personal freedom and privacy of crypto users. They see the bill as an overly strict regulatory measure for the digital asset sector.
What is the stance of the Treasury Department on cryptocurrencies?
The Treasury Department has expressed the need for new laws to address the use of cryptocurrencies in facilitating illegal activities like money laundering, sanction evasion, and financing illegal weapons programs.
How significant is the problem of illicit activities in the cryptocurrency space?
While concerns about the illicit use of cryptocurrencies are valid, analysis shows that less than 1% of annual cryptocurrency transactions are illicit. In comparison, a much larger percentage of global GDP is suspected to be involved in illegal activities through traditional banking systems and cash.
More about Cryptocurrency Regulation
- Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act Overview
- Senators Supporting the Crypto Bill
- Cryptocurrency Regulation Criticism
- Treasury Department’s Stance on Cryptocurrencies
- Illicit Activities in Cryptocurrency Transactions Analysis
4 comments
honestly, how much of this is really about stopping crime and how much is about control and surveillance? I’m not convinced.
Interesting times we live in. Watching the government try to keep up with technology is like watching a cat chase its tail, always a bit behind.
So they’re really going for it huh, regulating crypto’s gonna be tough. but necessary I guess? don’t know how they’ll enforce all this tho…
This is just more government overreach! They always use “security” as an excuse to take away our freedoms. This bill is bad news for crypto.